日本語 English

Blue Value™ ・ Rose Value™

Blue Value™ — Environmental Contributions

Earth blue

Instead of green, which is associated with nature and ecology, blue represents something much bigger the earth.
It is also our corporate color and signifies harmony with the global environment and our contributions to society.

The Goals of Blue Value™

The Mitsui Chemicals Group, whose Corporate Mission is “harmony with the global environment,” lists “a circular society in harmony with the environment” as one of its ideal future society and aims to realize this through its business activities. In our VISION 2030, we have established a basic strategy to bolster circular economy initiatives to transform our business structure through efforts such as building circular economy-based business models and rolling out circular economy-compatible products by transitioning to alternative raw materials and fuels. We seek to contribute to the realization of a low-carbon, circular society that coexists with nature by addressing challenges like climate change and the circular economy, alongside business growth.

As a tool to track progress, we have established Blue Value™ as an internal assessment framework used to evaluate the environmental contributions of our products and services against defined criteria. By maximizing our contributions throughout the entire product life cycle through expanding and providing Blue Value™ products and services, we hope to achieve corporate growth for the Group and realize our ideal future society.

How We Assess Blue Value™

For impact assessment, we use a proprietary method based on LIME2*2, one of the environmental impact assessment methods based on life cycle assessment*1.

As part of the Blue Value™ assessment process, products and services are evaluated according to their environmental contributions from three perspectives: “Reducing CO2” “Conserving resources” and “Coexisting with nature.” These contributions are assessed as objectively as possible from two aspects: “Approach to social challenges” and “Our reasonable involvement.”

*1 Life cycle assessment (LCA):

A technique to quantitatively assess environmental impacts associated with all the stages of a product’s life, from raw materials, to manufacturing, processing, use, and disposal.

*2 LIME2 (Life-cycle Impact assessment Method based on Endpoint modeling):

Damage assessment-type life cycle environmental impact assessment method based on environmental conditions in Japan.

Approach to Social Challenges

(1) Scope of Evaluation

In the Blue Value™ initiative, we have established three contribution categories —“Reducing CO2,” “conserving resources,” and “coexisting with nature”— based on the Group’s material topics, such as “product design considering the entire product life cycle,” “climate change,” and the “circular economy.” These categories are derived from the impact areas of LIME2, a life cycle impact assessment method.

(2) Scenarios

When a product or service is submitted for assessment under the Blue Value™ framework, a scenario is created to determine how comparative assessments will be conducted within the specific supply chain relevant to the product or service. The review board confirms the appropriateness of the selected comparison targets by considering factors such as current technology and market conditions, including general products on the market, our own existing products, and approaches when there are no suitable comparison products.

(3) Evaluation Criteria

For the three contribution categories, we have established actions aimed at addressing social challenges (decision item) from the perspectives of material use, energy consumption, waste emissions and other factors. These criteria define the types of data required to demonstrate environmental contributions and the information necessary to verify trade-offs. Based on this, the review board assesses whether the Group’s products and services sufficiently contribute to addressing social challenges for the targeted contribution categories for recognition. They also assess whether the actions taken result in any negative impacts in other areas, while considering the environmental impact across the entire life cycle of the products and services.

Additionally, if a product or service is deemed likely to be used to promote any socially harmful impacts, it is considered inappropriate for recognition as a Blue Value™ product or service. In such cases, regardless of the individual contribution content, recognition is avoided.

Examples of uses not eligible for Blue Value™ Rose Value™ recognition

  • Tobacco (due to health concerns)
  • Fertilizer coatings (identified as a source of microplastics, which negatively impact the environment), etc.

(4) Simplifying the Assessments

In some cases, it can be challenging to gather all the necessary information to assess the environmental impact of downstream industries that use our products and services. In the Blue Value™ assessment process, we allow for the assessment based on certain approximations and assumptions to simplify calculations. The review board ensures that these approximations and assumptions are applied appropriately.

Blue Value™ Contribution Categories and Actions Aimed at Helping Solve Social Challenges

Contribution categories (certification item) Impact areas (LIME2) Actions aimed at helping solve social challenges (decision item)

Reducing CO2

7 Affordable and clean energy
9 Industry, innovation, infrastructure
11 Sustainable cities and communities
13 Climate action
Global warming
Ozone layer depletion
  • Change to materials with lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity
  • Reduce use of raw materials
  • Change to renewable raw materials
  • Improve energy efficiency of equipment and machinery
  • Change to energy sources with lower GHG emissions
    among other actions

Conserving resources

6 Clean water and sanitation
8 Decent work and economic growth
9 Industry, innovation, infrastructure
11 Sustainable cities and communities
12 Responsible consumption, production
14 Life below water
Resource consumption
Land use
Waste
  • Reduce use of chemical raw materials (fossil resources), mineral resources, etc.
  • Change to chemicals derived from renewable resources
    among other actions

Coexisting with nature

3 Good health and well-being
6 Clean water and sanitation
11 Sustainable cities and communities
12 Responsible consumption, production
14 Life below water
15 Life on land
Acidification
Urban air pollution / indoor air pollution
Photochemical oxidants
Toxic chemical substances
Ecotoxicity
Eutrophication
  • Avoid use of toxic materials
  • Reduce emissions of hazardous waste
    among other actions
Contribution categories (certification item)) Actions aimed at helping solve social challenges (decision item)
  Impact areas (LIME2)

Reducing CO2

7 Affordable and clean energy 9 Industry, innovation, infrastructure 11 Sustainable cities and communities
  • Change to materials with lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity
  • Reduce use of raw materials
  • Change to renewable raw materials
  • Improve energy efficiency of equipment and machinery
  • Change to energy sources with lower GHG emissions
    among other actions
  Global warming
Ozone layer depletion

Conserving resources

6 Clean water and sanitation 8 Decent work and economic growth 9 Industry, innovation, infrastructure 11 Sustainable cities and communities 12 Responsible consumption, production 14 Life below water
  • Reduce use of chemical raw materials (fossil resources), mineral resources, etc.
  • Change to chemicals derived from renewable resources
    among other actions
  Resource consumption
Land use
Waste

Coexisting with nature

3 Good health and well-being 6 Clean water and sanitation 11 Sustainable cities and communities 12 Responsible consumption, production 14 Life below water 15 Life on land
  • Avoid use of toxic materials
  • Reduce emissions of hazardous waste
    among other actions
  Acidification
Urban air pollution / indoor air pollution
Photochemical oxidants
Toxic chemical substances
Ecotoxicity
Eutrophication

Our reasonable involvement

We evaluate the extent to which the Group’s products and services contribute to our approach to social challenges identified in the first stage of assessment. This evaluation considers not only the Company’s direct contributions, but also aims to visualize the broader impact across the supply chain, including processing by customers and the use of the final products.

Overview of Recent Review Results

At the FY2025 review board, 25 products and services were recognized as Blue Value™. In the FY2025 review, chemicals made using bio-based hydrocarbon derivatives and slow-release fertilizers that do not generate microplastics were newly recognized. In addition, the periodic review, conducted every five years to reflect evolving social demands and market environment, resulted in the re-certification of resin raw materials produced through improvements in our manufacturing energy efficiency, as well as disposable diaper materials that contribute to resource conservation through product lightweighting, continuing to be recognized as Blue Value™ products following reassessment.

On the other hand, applications involving a switch to alternative raw materials aimed at reducing the use of fossil resources were deemed unsuitable for recognition under the Blue Value™ framework  when they failed to adequately consider trade-offs across the entire supply chain, such as cases where a supply chain-wide assessment indicated increased GHG emissions. Applications that lacked sufficient quantitative data to substantiate their environmental contribution  were also deemed unsuitable for recognition under the Blue Value™ framework.

In addition, during the five-year renewal process, applicants are required to review and update their application details when the original application no longer adequately reflect changes in the market environment. This includes cases where environmental performance that was considered advanced five years ago has since become the market standard, or where the products used as benchmarks are no longer the primary competitors in the market. Based on the revised application, the review board determines whether the product or service should continue to be recognized as Blue Value™.

By applying this two-step assessment—considering both the approach to social challenges and our reasonable involvement, while also taking into account prerequisites and trade-offs—we strive to evaluate as objectively as possible whether a product or service truly contributes to addressing social challenges. Additionally, we base our reviews on the advice and views from external advisors regarding the appropriateness of the assessment and the significance of social contribution throughout the entire supply chain.

External Advisors

When determining the assessment methods and review criteria for Blue Value™ products, we receive advice from Professor Norihiro Itsubo of the School of Creative Science and Engineering at Waseda University, who serves as an external advisor and provides insights from a specialist perspective. In addition, prior to the review board meeting, we also take into account his expert opinions on the level of contribution made by the applicant products, and the review board determines whether they meet the criteria.

Decarbonization and a circular economy are central to addressing the world's problems, as well as to corporate growth strategies, and businesses need to promote cross-industry eco-innovation. Blue Value™ helps visualize the reduction in environmental impact of products from a product life cycle perspective. This is extremely important information for quickly achieving a carbon neutral and recycling-oriented society. Mitsui Chemicals has adopted the sales revenue ratio of Blue Value™ products as a key performance indicator for its long-term business plan targets, which contributes to the rapid spread of products with reduced GHG emission footprint. So, I strongly support its activities.


Blue Value™ advisor

Dr. ITSUBO Norihiro

Professor,

School of Creative Science and Engineering,

Waseda University

*Each affiliation is from the time when the article was created.

Dr. ITSUBO Norihiro